ArticleBMC genomics2026
Comparative genomics reveal signatures of ecological specialization in the striped ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeetles (Coleoptera) display exceptional dietary diversity and occupy a wide range of ecological niches, often involving close associations with plants and microbes. Ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae; Scolytinae and Platypodinae) exemplify ecological specialization by cultivating mutualistic fungi within galleries excavated in their host trees' xylem, with the fungi serving as their main food source. The striped ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum is a pest of conifers, relying on its nutritional mutualist Phialophoropsis ferruginea for survival. This fungiculture-based lifestyle provides a system for exploring how specialized mutualism is reflected at the genomic level. Hence, we performed a comparative genomics analysis between T. lineatum and nine other beetle species with different ecological specializations. We hypothesized that fungiculture is associated with specific genomic adaptations, including changes in gene family composition related to nutrition, detoxification, and immunity.
resultsThe small genome of T. lineatum (74.4-83.6 Mb) exhibits comparatively low levels of repetitive DNA (19.9%), including a reduced proportion of transposable elements. Annotation generated 14,830 high-quality gene predictions, most of which were supported by transcript evidence or functional domains. Comparative orthology analysis across ten beetle species identified 13,896 orthogroups, with T.lineatum having 78 species-specific orthogroups comprising 238 genes. Gene family evolution analyses revealed 33 families with significant size changes in T. lineatum, including 16 expansions and 17 contractions. Notably, gene families associated with digestion, detoxification, and immunity were contracted. These included glycoside hydrolase 28, cytochrome P450, serpin, and trypsin families, which may reflect the fungus-based, rather than plant-based, diet of T. lineatum, and reduced reliance on broad-spectrum immune defenses. In contrast, expansions in the THAP and CD80-like immunoglobulin domain families indicate diversification of genes involved in genomic regulation and immune recognition.
conclusionsOur results suggest that the genome of T. lineatum is characterized by low repeat content and compact gene architecture. The observed contractions in key gene families involved in plant digestion, detoxification, and immunity may represent genomic signatures of its obligate mutualistic specialization and narrow ecological niche. Our findings provide the first insights into the genomic adaptations of fungus-farming ambrosia beetles, suggesting that co-evolved insect-microbe mutualisms may lead to reductions in a variety of gene families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.