Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298375›Full record

SynthesisActa dermato-venereologica2026

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Ex Vivo Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy for Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sarah Lukacs, Luis Messner, Michael Flaig, Andreas Ohlmann, Daniela Hartmann, Benjamin Kendziora

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah LukacsDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.
Luis MessnerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-0345-9032
Michael FlaigDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-3487-2691
Andreas OhlmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7101-9361
Daniela HartmannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Thalkirchner Street Hospital, Munich Municipial Hospital Group, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-8133
Benjamin KendzioraDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Thalkirchner Street Hospital, Munich Municipial Hospital Group, Munich, Germany. benjamin.kendziora@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-5380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated available data on the diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (EVCM) for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in tissue specimens and for margin assessment in micrographic surgery, using conventional histopathological analysis as reference standard. MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched in November 2024 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating EVCM for BCC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using bivariate random effects models. Sixteen studies comprising 1,387 specimens were included. The pooled mean EVCM acquisition time was 7.0 min (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3-9.4). For BCC diagnosis in tissue specimens, pooled sensitivity was 91.4% (95% CI: 85.9-94.9) and pooled specificity was 91.1% (95% CI: 79.2-94.5). Regarding margin assessment, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 79.5% (95% CI: 65.0-89.0) and 92.2% (95% CI: 85.5-95.9). In conclusion, EVCM shows high sensitivity and specificity for BCC diagnosis in tissue specimens and may selectively replace conventional histology when rapid diagnosis is desired. For margin assessment, EVCM has high specificity but moderate sensitivity. Therefore, conventional histology should still be considered as a subsequent step, particularly after the final excision stage of stepwise micrographic surgery.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaSkin NeoplasmsHumansMargins of ExcisionMicroscopy, ConfocalMohs SurgeryPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42298375
PMCPMC13269050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.