Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298371›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Separating intrinsic from extrinsic stomatal control in different soils.

Ibrahim Bourbia, Luke Yates, Andrea Carminati, Timothy J Brodribb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ibrahim BourbiaSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tas, 7001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-2874
Luke YatesSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tas, 7001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-3169
Andrea CarminatiDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-0480
Timothy J BrodribbSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tas, 7001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4964-6107

Funding

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The regulation of stomata in response to environmental changes is one of the most dynamic and important behaviours in vascular plants, playing a central role in determining gas exchange and vulnerability to drought. Yet whether this regulation is determined by intrinsic species physiology or by soil hydraulic properties or a combination of both remains unsolved. Here, we use a long-term dataset of needle water potential (Ψ

Indexed as

Plant StomataSoilModels, BiologicalPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationWaterSoilWaterplant water potentialsoil hydraulicssoil moisture/droughtsoil texturesoil typestomatal behaviorvapour pressure deficit (VPD)

Identifiers

PMID42298371
PMCPMC13443157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.