Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298318›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational science2026

Utilization of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development in Japan: A 10-Year Analysis of Approved Anticancer Agents (2014-2024).

Kana Morihisa, Hiroyuki Yoshitsugu, Hirokazu Wakuda, Naoto Uemura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kana MorihisaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-9987-9682
Hiroyuki YoshitsuguDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita Prefecture, Japan.
Hirokazu WakudaGeneral Clinical Research Center, Oita University Hospital, Yufu City, Oita Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-8251
Naoto UemuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu City, Oita Prefecture, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3722-8979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticancer agents with favorable safety profiles, such as immunomodulators and molecular-targeted agents, are increasingly used in recent cancer therapy, and clinical trials for these agents increasingly incorporate healthy volunteers as well as cancer patients. Clinical trials in healthy volunteers allow intensive safety monitoring and intensive pharmacokinetic sampling, enabling the acquisition of high-quality, broad-range pharmacokinetic and safety data within a shorter timeframe and at lower cost. Leveraging these advantages by utilizing healthy volunteer trials in place of patient trials may contribute to more rapid and efficient implementation of anticancer drug development and is expected to help eliminate the "drug lag" and "drug loss" that have been concerns in Japan's research and development process in recent years. In this study, we investigated the clinical data packages of newly approved anticancer agents in Japan from April 2014 to March 2024 and evaluated trends in cases in which data from Japanese healthy volunteers were obtained. We then summarized key considerations for anticancer drug development in Japan regarding whether data from Japanese healthy volunteers should be obtained.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DevelopmentHealthy VolunteersNeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalHumansJapanAntineoplastic Agentsdrug developmenthealthy subjectsoncology

Identifiers

PMID42298318
PMCPMC13269011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.