Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298274›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.

Ruhi Bhanap, Klaus Oberauer, Agnes Rosner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruhi BhanapDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. ruhi.bhanap@tu-dresden.de.
Klaus OberauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Agnes RosnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 100014_192204Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P1_186032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Looking at Nothing" (LAN) effect describes the tendency to look toward locations where information was originally presented during memory retrieval. Previous research by Scholz et al. (Memory & Cognition, 46, 230-243, 2018) suggested that memory performance may benefit not only from eye movements to these locations, but also from covert shifts of attention. The present study investigated whether such effects also occur during retrieval from working memory. Across two experiments, participants encoded three word pairs presented at distinct screen locations. Memory for one word pair was later tested using auditory cues, either immediately after encoding (Experiments 1 and 2) or after a delay (Experiment 2). During retrieval, either gaze location (Experiments 1 and 2) or covert attention (Experiment 1) was manipulated using a digit-tracking task presented at one of three locations: congruent with the original word-pair location, incongruent, or central.Results showed no differences in memory performance between conditions. Thus, directing gaze or covert attention toward the original presentation location did not facilitate retrieval. These findings suggest that spatial reinstatement may not enhance working- or long-term memory performance in associative recognition tasks involving word pairs.

Indexed as

AttentionEye MovementsMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermMental RecallAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCovert attentionEye movementsWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID42298274
PMCPMC13269553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.