ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The role of eye movements and covert shifts of attention in working and long-term memory retrieval.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Tracking Reactivation of Location Information during Memory Strategies: Insights from Eye Movements.Journal of cognition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "Looking at Nothing" (LAN) effect describes the tendency to look toward locations where information was originally presented during memory retrieval. Previous research by Scholz et al. (Memory & Cognition, 46, 230-243, 2018) suggested that memory performance may benefit not only from eye movements to these locations, but also from covert shifts of attention. The present study investigated whether such effects also occur during retrieval from working memory. Across two experiments, participants encoded three word pairs presented at distinct screen locations. Memory for one word pair was later tested using auditory cues, either immediately after encoding (Experiments 1 and 2) or after a delay (Experiment 2). During retrieval, either gaze location (Experiments 1 and 2) or covert attention (Experiment 1) was manipulated using a digit-tracking task presented at one of three locations: congruent with the original word-pair location, incongruent, or central.Results showed no differences in memory performance between conditions. Thus, directing gaze or covert attention toward the original presentation location did not facilitate retrieval. These findings suggest that spatial reinstatement may not enhance working- or long-term memory performance in associative recognition tasks involving word pairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.