ArticleOral radiology2026
Multi-b-value DWI-based habitat radiomics analysis for differentiating sinonasal small round cell malignant tumors from non-small round cell malignant tumors.
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the value of habitat radiomics analysis using multi-b-value diffusion weighted imaging in differentiating sinonasal small round cell malignant tumors (SRCMTs) from non-small round cell malignant tumors (non-SRCMTs).
methodsThis study enrolled 110 patients of sinonasal SRCMTs and non-SRCMTs, who were randomly divided into a training dataset (n = 88) and a test dataset (n = 22). Based on the true diffusion coefficient (Dt), perfusion fraction (f), and mean kurtosis coefficient (MK), which respectively characterize cellular density, perfusion, and heterogeneity, the sinonasal tumors were classified into four distinct habitats through k-means clustering. After extracting radiomics features and reducing dimensions, the radiomics, habitat, and fusion models were developed using Logistic regression (LR), NaiveBayes (NB), Support vector machine (SVM), RandomForest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and MultiLayer perceptron (MLP) classifiers. Model performance was evaluated with the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsThe fusion model, specifically MK+Habitat_3_RF, which incorporated radiomics and habitat features, achieved the best performance with AUCs of 0.936 and 0.940 in the training and test datasets, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA results indicated improved fit and net benefit of the MK+Habitat_3_RF. Moreover, the AUC of the MK+Habitat_3_RF was significantly higher than the radiomics model of conventional DWI, the first-order feature "original_firstorder_Mean" of ADC (ADCmean), and visual assessment of two radiologists in the test dataset (Ps < 0.05).
conclusionsThe MK+Habitat_3_RF can serve as an accurate and non-invasive tool for distinguishing between sinonasal SRCMTs and non-SRCMTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42298269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.