ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Bladder Endometriosis: An Updated Narrative Review with Three Surgical Cases.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisBladder endometriosis (BE) represents a rare yet clinically significant manifestation of deep infiltrating endometriosis. It is frequently underdiagnosed owing to nonspecific urinary symptoms and the coexistence of other urological or gynecological conditions. Management remains challenging, requiring a high index of clinical suspicion, advanced imaging, and multidisciplinary surgical expertise.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of BE, supported by three representative cases that highlight diagnostic difficulties and surgical challenges.
resultsThe literature indicates that BE accounts for 70-85% of urinary tract endometriosis, and that cyclic hematuria occurs in fewer than half of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for preoperative lesion mapping, and histopathology provides definitive diagnosis. Medical therapy offers temporary symptomatic relief but is limited by high recurrence rates. Partial cystectomy, preferably performed using minimally invasive approaches, remains the first-choice treatment for detrusor-infiltrating lesions. Our cases reflect the heterogeneity of presentation and demonstrate favorable outcomes with laparoscopic partial cystectomy with barbed suture closure.
conclusionsBladder endometriosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of women of reproductive age presenting with chronic pelvic pain or lower urinary tract symptoms, particularly those with a history of pelvic surgery. Accurate diagnosis relies on the integration of clinical suspicion, imaging findings, and histopathological confirmation. Surgical excision remains the cornerstone of treatment of choice, with complete resection the primary therapeutic goal. Emerging surgical techniques, including the use of barbed sutures, show promise in reducing procedure-related morbidity. Further research is required to optimize diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42298265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.