Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298253›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Will I speak louder if I see you struggling to understand? Speech modifications in response to non-verbal visual cues of listening effort.

Elena Gessa, Chiara Valzolgher, Elena Giovanelli, Tommaso Rosi, Clément Desoche, Alessandro Farnè, Francesco Pavani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena GessaCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences -, CIMeC, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, Italy. elena.gessa@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0623-9130
Chiara ValzolgherCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences -, CIMeC, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Elena GiovanelliCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences -, CIMeC, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Tommaso RosiLevel Up S.R.L., Trento, Italy.
Clément DesocheIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (Impact), Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bron, France.
Alessandro Farnè *Integrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team (Impact), Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Bron, France.
Francesco Pavani *Center for Mind/Brain Sciences -, CIMeC, University of Trento, Corso Bettini 31, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During face-to-face interactions, overt non-verbal cues from conversational partners can reflect the quality of the conversation. Here, we investigated the impact of specific visual non-verbal cues (i.e., facial expressions of confusion, approaching movements towards the speaker), on the speakers' acoustic-phonetic adaptations typically employed to enhance clarity (i.e., speech rate, voice intensity, and pitch). Participants read sentences to a listener seated in a separate room and visible through a head-mounted display. Crucially, no auditory feedback was provided. Unknown to participants, the listener was a confederate whose behavior was pre-recorded in silence using a 360° video camera. The confederate simulated three different levels of listening effort: easy, medium, and hard. After each trial, participants rated the estimated listening effort and comprehension of the confederate, as well as their own speaking effort. In Experiment 1 (N = 22), participants were told their voice was transmitted with varying background noise levels, providing a rationale for potential listener difficulties. In Experiment 2 (N = 12), no mention of background noise was made, to further isolate the effects of visual cues. In both experiments, participants adjusted their speech to the seen listener's behavior. Experiment 1 showed adaptations across all measured parameters, and significant modulations persisted for most parameters in Experiment 2. These adaptations were already present in the earliest phase of exposure to the visual effort cues and remained stable across the mini-block, suggesting a rapid and highly sensitive monitoring mechanism. These findings indicate that visible non-verbal cues of listening effort can elicit acoustic-phonetic adaptations, even in the absence of acoustic feedback or explicit communicative signals, highlighting their role in regulating communication and maintaining speech clarity.

Indexed as

ComprehensionCuesFacial ExpressionSpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFace-to-face interactionListening effortNon-verbal communicationSpeech production

Identifiers

PMID42298253
PMCPMC13269471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.