Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298216›Full record

ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2026

[Ipsilateral venous puncture and catheter placement after axillary lymphadenectomy].

J Weber, F Wappler, M Schieren, J Defosse

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J WeberKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Kliniken Köln gGmbH, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland. jonas.weber2@uni-wh.de.
F WapplerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Kliniken Köln gGmbH, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland.
M SchierenKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Kliniken Köln gGmbH, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland.
J DefosseKlinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum der Universität Witten/Herdecke, Kliniken Köln gGmbH, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) or radiotherapy for breast cancer or malignant melanoma, damage to the lymphatic tissue can reduce the lymphatic transport capacity and increase interstitial fluid accumulation. This can lead to swelling, pain, progressive trophic skin changes and an elevated risk of infections. Moreover, functional impairment of the affected limb can result in significant psychosocial consequences. Affected patients are usually informed about their increased lifetime risk of developing lymphedema and current guidelines from numerous international and national societies recommend that ipsilateral medical interventions, such as vascular punctures for blood sampling or blood pressure measurements should be avoided. If contralateral venous access is difficult, suboptimal puncture sites such as the foot are chosen or a central venous catheter is placed, even though this is associated with limited access and reduced visualization of the puncture site. Unsuccessful venipuncture attempts can cause pain, discomfort and functional limitations; in particular, placing peripheral intravenous catheters at suboptimal sites such as the foot can substantially impair mobility and thus increase the risk of complications such as deep vein thrombosis. Until recently, evidence on ipsilateral procedures was scarce and largely derived from small case studies; however, emerging data indicate that isolated procedures such as venous puncture and catheter placement can be safely performed following ALND or axillary radiotherapy in the absence of pre-existing lymphedema. Likewise, noninvasive methods (e.g., blood pressure measurements) do not appear to elevate the risk of lymphedema, although ipsilateral interventions should remain contraindicated in patients with established lymphedema. Thus, following an unsuccessful contralateral puncture, an ipsilateral puncture should be considered before selecting unfavorable puncture sites or considering the placement of a central venous catheter.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousLymph Node ExcisionPhlebotomyAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphedemaBreast cancerBreast cancer-related lymphedemaLymphedemaPeripheral intravenous catheterRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID42298216
PMCPMC13518435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.