ReviewDie Anaesthesiologie2026
[Ipsilateral venous puncture and catheter placement after axillary lymphadenectomy].
Review in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) or radiotherapy for breast cancer or malignant melanoma, damage to the lymphatic tissue can reduce the lymphatic transport capacity and increase interstitial fluid accumulation. This can lead to swelling, pain, progressive trophic skin changes and an elevated risk of infections. Moreover, functional impairment of the affected limb can result in significant psychosocial consequences. Affected patients are usually informed about their increased lifetime risk of developing lymphedema and current guidelines from numerous international and national societies recommend that ipsilateral medical interventions, such as vascular punctures for blood sampling or blood pressure measurements should be avoided. If contralateral venous access is difficult, suboptimal puncture sites such as the foot are chosen or a central venous catheter is placed, even though this is associated with limited access and reduced visualization of the puncture site. Unsuccessful venipuncture attempts can cause pain, discomfort and functional limitations; in particular, placing peripheral intravenous catheters at suboptimal sites such as the foot can substantially impair mobility and thus increase the risk of complications such as deep vein thrombosis. Until recently, evidence on ipsilateral procedures was scarce and largely derived from small case studies; however, emerging data indicate that isolated procedures such as venous puncture and catheter placement can be safely performed following ALND or axillary radiotherapy in the absence of pre-existing lymphedema. Likewise, noninvasive methods (e.g., blood pressure measurements) do not appear to elevate the risk of lymphedema, although ipsilateral interventions should remain contraindicated in patients with established lymphedema. Thus, following an unsuccessful contralateral puncture, an ipsilateral puncture should be considered before selecting unfavorable puncture sites or considering the placement of a central venous catheter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.