ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Risk of thromboembolic events in patients with polycythaemia vera: a study based on german health claims data.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study evaluated thrombotic outcomes and treatment patterns in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in German health claims data. Prevalent and incident patient populations were identified, and longitudinal cohorts were formed to assess thromboembolic event (TE) rates, phlebotomy frequency, and the development of hydroxyurea (HU) intolerance or resistance. Patients were stratified into four thrombotic risk categories based on prior TE, age ≥ 60 years, or both, with low risk defined as the absence of both risk factors. Between 2021 and 2023, approximately one-third of prevalent patients underwent phlebotomy annually, whereas incident patients required more frequent procedures. TE risk differed substantially by risk category: patients with event- and age-based high-risk had a 6.2-fold higher rate than low-risk patients (82.4 vs. 13.4 per 1,000 person-years). Both prior TE history and advanced age contribute to TE-risk. While age-based high-risk alone showed a slightly stronger effect than event-based high-risk (11.3% vs. 9.0%), patients with both risk factors had the highest TE incidence (21.1%), highlighting the clinical relevance of thromboembolic history beyond age alone. Among incident patients, TE-free survival declined from 91.9% at one year to 89.3% at three years post-diagnosis. During follow-up, 22% of HU-treated patients met proxy measures for intolerance or resistance to HU after a median of 337 days. These patients experienced higher TE rates compared to patients treated with ruxolitinib (72.9 vs. 46.7 per 1,000 person-years), although differences were not significant. This real-world analysis suggests a persistent TE risk in PV, particularly among TE-based high-risk patients, and supports the importance of risk-adapted monitoring and timely therapy optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.