Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298204›Full record

Observational studySleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026

Excess daytime sleepiness, daily functioning and health-related quality of life during the first year after metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with a known and unknown obstructive sleep apnea status.

Claudia Berends, Laura Heusschen, Sophie L van Veldhuisen, Steve M M de Castro, Ruben N van Veen, Marinus J Wiezer, Ronald S L Liem, François M H van Dielen, Ahmet Demirkiran, Evert-Jan G Boerma and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claudia BerendsVitalys Obesity Clinic part of Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands. clberends@rijnstate.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-1160
Laura HeusschenVitalys Obesity Clinic part of Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Sophie L van VeldhuisenVitalys Obesity Clinic part of Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Steve M M de CastroDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruben N van VeenDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marinus J WiezerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Ronald S L LiemDutch Obesity Clinic, The Hague, The Netherlands.
François M H van DielenDepartment of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Ahmet DemirkiranDepartment of Surgery, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Evert-Jan G BoermaDepartment of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Timon M FabiusDepartment of Pulmonology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Eric J HazebroekVitalys Obesity Clinic part of Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 843004110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite a high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), there is no consensus on the best perioperative OSA strategy. Supplemental oxygen therapy without pre-operative OSA-testing (pulse oximetry) is safe and more cost-effective compared to preoperative OSA-testing using poly(somno)graphy (sleep test). This study aimed to compare these strategies on excess daytime sleepiness (EDS), its impact on daily functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

methodsMulticenter prospective cohort study including 1388 patients, 691 in the sleep test and 697 in the pulse oximetry group based on local protocols. EDS (ESS), its impact on daily functioning (FOSQ-10), HRQoL (RAND-36) and total weight loss (TWL) were assessed preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. (Sub)scores were compared over time between and within groups using linear mixed models.

resultsNo differences between the pulse oximetry and sleep test strategy were found in EDS, its influence on daily life and HRQoL, and all improved after MBS. In the pulse oximetry group a lower TWL was found 1 month postoperative (-0.7%).

conclusionConsidering that pulse oximetry is more cost-effective, equally safe and comparable in EDS, its effect on daily functioning and HRQoL and no clinically relevant difference in TWL was found compared to the sleep test strategy, this study lends further support for pulse oximetry being the best strategy for managing OSA in patients undergoing MBS.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingBariatric SurgeryDisorders of Excessive SomnolenceQuality of LifeSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOximetryPolysomnographyProspective StudiesBariatric surgeryExcess daytime sleepinessHealth related quality of lifeMetabolicObstructive sleep apnea

Identifiers

PMID42298204
PMCPMC13269512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.