ArticleNature genetics2026
Decoding common and rare noncoding variant effects across cellular and developmental contexts.
Article in Nature genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Genetic architectures of brain-related traits are shaped by strong selective constraints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Bridging precision agriculture and human medicine through comparative genetics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Integrating multi-omic QTLs and predictive models reveals regulatory architectures at immune related GWAS loci in CD4+ T cells.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Deep learning the dynamic regulatory sequence code of cardiac organoid differentiation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interpreting how noncoding variants act in specific cell types across human development is a major challenge. Here we generated 3 billion predictions from deep learning sequence models of chromatin accessibility across diverse fetal and adult cellular contexts. These prioritized functional variants and revealed a dichotomy: common variants are more cell-type-specific, whereas ultra-rare variants had larger and broader effects across cell types, with the strongest evidence of purifying selection in fetal neurons. Leveraging these insights, we developed FLARE (Functional Lasso Analysis of Regulatory Evolution), which integrates evolutionary constraint to prioritize noncoding variants with extreme regulatory effects. FLARE provided a general framework for studying regulatory variation, from de novo mutations in childhood disorders to rare variants underlying outlier adult brain expression and common variants enriched for schizophrenia heritability. Together, these results demonstrate how integrating single-cell chromatin accessibility, population genetics and deep learning can identify regulatory variants that influence human development and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.