ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2026
Integrated multi-technology exploration of the mechanism by which Badushengji San regulates core targets in diabetic foot ulcer.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), a prevalent and refractory diabetic complication, lacks clear pathological targets and effective therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to identify potential DFU biomarkers and preliminarily explore the mechanism of Badushengji San (BDS) in treating DFU. Transcriptome datasets (GSE199939, GSE134431) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data (GSE165816) were retrieved to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and DFU-related cell subsets. Intersection genes among DEGs, drug targets, and high-dimensional Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (hdWGCNA) genes were then identified. Core biomarkers were subsequently screened using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), and Boruta algorithms. Macrophages were defined as DFU-associated core cells. Three biomarkers (CYCS, HMOX1, UPP1) showed diagnostic value (the area under the curve (AUC) of UPP1 = 0.973). BDS (50 ng/mL) reversed 40 mM glucose-induced L929 cell injury by restoring HMOX1 and suppressing UPP1 expression. These biomarkers were enriched in pathways like nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), and their abnormal expression was closely linked to DFU pathological progression. Notably, Benzoyl paeoniflorin had the lowest binding energy (-10.06 kcal/mol) with UPP1. Collectively, this study identified CYCS, HMOX1, and UPP1 as potential biomarkers for DFU and preliminarily revealed the potential regulatory effect and molecular characteristics of BDS in DFU intervention, which lays a bioinformatic foundation and provides preliminary experimental clues for further in vivo mechanism research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42298176What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.