Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298121›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Simulation based learning as a strategy for patient education training in medical students.

M Aparicio, J López-Herce, N Montalvo, M J Solana, P Vázquez, S Mencía, Jesus López-Herce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M AparicioDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J López-HerceDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
N MontalvoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M J SolanaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
P VázquezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
S MencíaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jesus López-HerceDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Pl. de Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. jesuslop@ucm.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare different methods of patient education for medical students. A prospective study involving 5th and 6th year medical students that were assigned to three groups paediatric primary care (group 1), paediatric intensive care (group 2), and paediatric emergency (group 3). All groups received the same theoretical training in patient education. Additionally, group 1 received practical training in patient education with patients, group 2 received practical training in patient education with simulation, and group 3 did not receive any practical training in patient education. A theoretical pre- and post-training assessment and a practical simulation assessment were performed. Furthermore, the students evaluated their practical performance. Results between the three groups and the assessment by the students and their teachers were compared. After theoretical training, all groups improved their theoretical knowledge (mean [SD]) (pretest 8.0[0.1]; posttest 9.3[0.0]; p < 0.001). In the practical evaluation, group 2 students obtained a higher evaluation (8.1[0.1]) than group 1 (7.4[0.1]) and group 3 (7.1[0.1]). p < 0.05). The students' self-assessment was higher (8.2[0.1]) than that of the researchers (7.6[0.1]; p < 0.001). Our results show that combining theoretical lessons with simulation-based learning is the best method to reach practical competencies in patient education for medical students.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningMaleProspective StudiesClinical practiceMedical studentPatient educationPractical trainingSimulation

Identifiers

PMID42298121
PMCPMC13529802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.