ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Patient experience after pelvic exenteration: chronic pain and quality of life.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic exenteration is a major surgery involving resection of the pelvic viscera and surrounding structures. Performed on patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic cancer, it is associated with high morbidity, persistent pain and low quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to determine the long-term prevalence of chronic pain and to characterise the pain and QoL experience in pelvic exenteration patients.
methodsA telephone survey was undertaken, utilising patient-reported outcome measures: the Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS) to assess pain and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) to measure QoL. Historic and demographic data were retrieved from hospital records to capture potential pre-, peri- and post-operative determinants. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation and comparative tests.
resultsThis study comprised 48 individuals, up to 13 years post-pelvic exenteration. Pain prevalence was 75%, with most patients reporting no to low-intensity pain, without disability (54%). SF-12 scores varied; physical scores were significantly lower than population norms, while mental scores were preserved. Pain intensity and disability (CPGS sub-scores) were associated with lower QoL, a relationship that was consistent across pain grades.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that the post-pelvic exenteration experience is characterised by reduced physical QoL and notable pain, highlighting the importance of early pain management optimisation. This research provides surgical candidates with authentic patient insight into life after surgery in a complex yet understudied population. Prospective longitudinal research is recommended to further examine patient trajectories and predictors of pain and poor QoL, enabling better targeted pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.