ArticleScientific reports2026
A study on the nonlinear impact and mechanism of artificial intelligence application level on corporate carbon emission intensity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under global pressure to reduce carbon emissions, understanding how the level of artificial intelligence (AI) use affects corporate carbon emissions (CCE) is crucial for achieving a green transition. This study, based on provincial panel data from China, employs a combination of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) empirical analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify the nonlinear effects of AI use levels on corporate carbon emission intensity and their transmission pathways, and conducts robustness and regional heterogeneity tests. The empirical results show that: first, the relationship between AI use levels and corporate carbon emissions exhibits a significant inverted U-shaped curve-in the early stages of development, due to high energy consumption in computing and deployment, AI adoption may temporarily increase carbon emissions; however, after exceeding a critical point, further deepening of use significantly reduces carbon emissions. Second, SEM analysis reveals several key mediating channels: improving green innovation efficiency (GIE), enhancing energy utilization efficiency (EUE), promoting Scientific innovation (SI), and driving industrial structure upgrading (ISU). These pathways collectively amplify the emission reduction effect of AI. Third, regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the AI emission reduction effect is significantly stronger in the eastern region than in the central and western regions. Finally, this study emphasizes the policy implications: while promoting the use of AI, energy structure and incentive mechanisms should be optimized, and differentiated policies should be formulated according to regional characteristics to achieve an AI-driven sustainable low-carbon transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.