ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Magnetic vs stapled technique in jejuno-ileal bipartition: one-year outcomes.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive side-to-side magnetic jejuno-ileal (JI) bipartition (MagJI) is a novel treatment for patients with mild obesity and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D) that obviates complications from enterotomies and retained foreign materials and may provide efficacy equivalent to the standard stapled JI procedure.
methodsThe comparative, non-randomized, non-inferiority study evaluated the efficacy of magnetic vs stapled JI in adults with body mass index (BMI, kg/m ENDPOINTS: weight, BMI, HbA1
resultsBetween March1, 2023, and June30, 2024, patients were enrolled and matched for comparison. No trocar site infection or severe adverse event related to the device or procedure in either group. At 1 year, regression-adjusted outcomes for an average baseline patient were as follows: weight 91.3 kg (stapled) vs 93.3 kg (magnetic); BMI 31.0 vs 31.3; HbA1
conclusionsEarly quantitative evidence demonstrated that magnetic JI achieved metabolic outcomes (BMI, HbA1 CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT#06232746.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.