ArticleScientific reports2026
Stress and risk of breast cancer; findings from a large population-based incident case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between stress and breast cancer (BC) remains a topic of debate. We investigated the association between stress experienced within the past year and the risk of BC. Population-based incident case-control study of 600 newly diagnosed BC cases and 600 population controls (18-75 years) recruited in Isfahan, Iran between 2021 and 2023. Logistic regression model with short-term stress as main exposure was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for confounders. Multiplicative interaction was tested between stress and menopausal status as well as other confounders. One-year stress level was significantly associated with BC risk. Compared with women reporting low stress levels, the odds of BC were higher among those with high stress levels in both the unadjusted model (OR = 3.10, 95%Cl: 2.45-3.92) and the fully adjusted model (OR = 3.38; 95%CI (2.56, 4.47)). Based on the statistical test for multiplicative interaction, the association appeared stronger among premenopausal women (adjusted OR = 4.88, 95% CI: 3.17-7.52) than among postmenopausal women (adjusted OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.53-3.58), with evidence of interaction by menopausal status (p for interaction = 0.018). Despite the inherent limitations of case-control studies, including potential recall and selection biases, the findings of the current study suggest that higher levels of stress experienced within the past year may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, particularly among premenopausal women. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify the nature and direction of this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.