Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42298001›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Study on wind resistance performance of high-rise corridor building based on quasi-steady static aeroelastic analysis method.

Yingke Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yingke ZhangState Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. 2510588@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1434-6646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the wind-sensitivity problem of high-rise connected corridor buildings caused by their high flexibility and low damping characteristics, this paper systematically investigates the wind-resistant performance of such buildings based on a semi-decoupled static aeroelastic analysis method of steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD), combined with finite element numerical simulation. Taking high-rise connected corridor buildings with streamlined airfoil sections as the research object, and adopting typical square and elliptical section buildings as control groups, this study verifies the effectiveness of the two proposed wind-resistant measures: the airfoil profile and the connected corridor. The static aeroelastic analysis considers the coupling relationship between aerodynamics and structures, and ensures the matching between the internal structure of the building and the aerodynamic shape through interpolation functions and rapid model reconstruction. With inter-story displacement and torsion angle adopted as evaluation indicators for wind-resistant performance, this paper systematically compares the differences in wind resistance with and without the proposed wind-resistant measures. This quasi-static wind resistance evaluation method based on static aeroelastic analysis can effectively quantify the peak displacement and inter-story torsion angle of the connected corridor under average wind loads, thereby providing a theoretical basis and data support for optimizing the supporting method of the connected corridor and formulating wind-resistant design parameters.

Indexed as

high-rise corridor buildingInter-story driftsemi-decoupled static aeroelastic analysisTorsion angleWind load

Identifiers

PMID42298001
PMCPMC13530155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.