ArticleScientific reports2026
First-principles multiscale modeling of cerebral hemodynamics enables personalized predictions of human brain temperature.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational bioheat modeling offers a powerful approach for characterizing brain temperature when direct measurements are limited. We developed a multiscale biophysical model with conservation of mass, momentum, and energy across all spatial scales to predict human brain temperature and compared the temperature maps with a previously developed model without global momentum conservation and in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry. Subject-specific brain anatomy obtained from MR images was incorporated into bioheat equations, integrating physiological parameters such as metabolic heat and cerebral blood flow. A novel approach using "transitional" microvasculature was introduced to bridge macro- and micro-scale domains, enabling momentum conservation and accurate prediction of cerebral hemodynamics. Across 30 healthy subjects, voxel-wise mean absolute differences of 0.18-0.36 °C between modeled and experimentally measured temperatures were observed. ROI-based analysis showed significant correlations between model predictions and MR measurements of brain temperature when system-wide momentum is properly conserved, but no correlation was observed for model predictions without momentum conservation. A simulated scenario of middle cerebral artery occlusion highlighted the importance of momentum conservation to mimic realistic physiological changes. The agreement of model predicted temperatures with MR measurements support future clinical applications where brain temperature may serve as a biomarker for neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.