ArticleScientific reports2026
Mapping Mpox vaccine hesitancy using an integrated machine learning and structural equation modeling approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study employs an integrated computational approach to investigate Mpox vaccine intention in Bangladesh as Mpox immunisation strategies require a thorough understanding of behavioural determinants. Data from 405 participants were analysed using a structured framework that included frequentist statistics to examine demographic relationships, t-distributed Stochastic Neighbour Embedding (t-SNE) for unsupervised grouping, and structural equation modelling (SEM) to confirm underlying behavioural trends. About 77% of people were willing to get vaccinated, and this was mainly influenced by their age (p = 0.002), education (p = 0.014), and occupation (p < 0.001). The t-SNE analysis revealed two patterns of reluctance-one linked to practical barriers (mainly younger people with limited education), and another linked to more neutral or skeptical attitudes. Structural equation modelling (SEM) confirmed that perceived vaccine efficacy (vaccine knowledge) was the primary driver of intention (β = 0.346, p = 0.005). Social-structural factors significantly shaped this intent; notably, living without family was a positive predictor ( β = 0.185, p < 0.001), whereas 96% of the hesitant group resided in traditional family units. Furthermore, a strong correlation between personal intent and community advocacy (r = 0.58) suggests that prosocial motivation is a key driver in this cohort. Our results show that vaccine reluctance is not uniform. In South Asia, public health interventions need to move away from generic messages and towards customised approaches that target the particular "efficacy gaps" and structural obstacles found by this multi-method mapping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.