Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42297952›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting from high-resolution digital imagery using YOLO with Oriented Bounding Boxes.

Hillson Ghimire, Maitiniyazi Maimaitijiang, Subash Thapa, Swas Kaushal, Dante Jerome Koupal, Mohammad Maruf Billah, Kushal Poudel, Shaurya Sehgal, Mandeep Singh, Santosh Subedi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hillson GhimireGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Maitiniyazi MaimaitijiangGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. Maitiniyazi.Maimaitijiang@sdstate.edu.
Subash ThapaDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Swas KaushalDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Dante Jerome KoupalDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Mohammad Maruf BillahGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Kushal PoudelGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Shaurya SehgalGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Mandeep SinghDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Santosh SubediGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Ubaid Ur Rehman JanjuaGeospatial Sciences Center of Excellence, Department of Geography and Geospatial Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Sunish Kumar SehgalDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. sunish.sehgal@sdstate.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation NSF Award #2316502USDA-ARS agreement 59-0206-2-153 (USWBSI)USDA-NIFA Hatch Project SD00H757USDA-NIFA WheatCAP Project Award #2022-68013-36439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-season estimation of wheat grain yield potential is critical for crop management and advancing breeding efforts. Spike and spikelet counts serve as key indicators directly linked to yield potential, yet their assessment still relies on manual counting which is both labor-intensive and error-prone. High-resolution digital (RGB) imagery combined with deep learning-based object detection methods has substantially advanced automatic wheat spike detection and counting. However, precise spikelet-level phenotyping remains largely underexplored. This study evaluates two recent YOLO variants, YOLOv11 and YOLOv12, for wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting using oriented bounding boxes (OBB), and introduces a new large-scale benchmark dataset comprising 48,521 spike and 60,404 spikelet instances with OBB annotations. For spike detection, the pre-trained YOLOv11 achieved superior accuracy (mAP@0.5 = 95.8%, Pearson r = 0.993) with shorter training and inference times compared to YOLOv12. For spikelet detection, the non-pretrained YOLOv11 demonstrated higher accuracy (mAP@0.5 = 99.0%), while counting performance was comparable across models. These results establish OBB-based YOLO detection as a robust and scalable approach for AI-driven wheat phenotyping.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTriticumDeep LearningDetection AlgorithmsEdible GrainPhenotypeDeep learningHigh-throughput phenotypingObject detectionOriented Bounding BoxWheat spike detectionWheat spikelet detectionYOLO

Identifiers

PMID42297952
PMCPMC13529697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.