ArticleScientific reports2026
Wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting from high-resolution digital imagery using YOLO with Oriented Bounding Boxes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-season estimation of wheat grain yield potential is critical for crop management and advancing breeding efforts. Spike and spikelet counts serve as key indicators directly linked to yield potential, yet their assessment still relies on manual counting which is both labor-intensive and error-prone. High-resolution digital (RGB) imagery combined with deep learning-based object detection methods has substantially advanced automatic wheat spike detection and counting. However, precise spikelet-level phenotyping remains largely underexplored. This study evaluates two recent YOLO variants, YOLOv11 and YOLOv12, for wheat spike and spikelet detection and counting using oriented bounding boxes (OBB), and introduces a new large-scale benchmark dataset comprising 48,521 spike and 60,404 spikelet instances with OBB annotations. For spike detection, the pre-trained YOLOv11 achieved superior accuracy (mAP@0.5 = 95.8%, Pearson r = 0.993) with shorter training and inference times compared to YOLOv12. For spikelet detection, the non-pretrained YOLOv11 demonstrated higher accuracy (mAP@0.5 = 99.0%), while counting performance was comparable across models. These results establish OBB-based YOLO detection as a robust and scalable approach for AI-driven wheat phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.