Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42297951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The influence of moral leadership (in)congruence on negative workplace gossip is explained by perceived hypocrisy.

Qingling Chen, Zhaohui Liu, Guanfeng Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingling ChenSchool of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economic, Urumqi, 830012, Republic of China.
Zhaohui LiuSchool of Business Administration, Xinjiang University of Finance and Economic, Urumqi, 830012, Republic of China.
Guanfeng ShiSchool of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi, 832000, Republic of China. m18240938265@163.com.

Funding

he National Natural Science Foundation of China 72162029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extant research positions moral leadership as a cornerstone of virtuous leadership, emphasizing its favorable impact on employees' assessments of leaders. Nevertheless, such studies often overstate its advantages by conflating the personal (moral person) and managerial (moral manager) dimensions of moral leadership, while neglecting its potential drawbacks. This research bridges leadership identity theory and ethics scholarship to investigate both aspects. Employing polynomial regression and response surface analysis, it demonstrates that alignment between a leader's moral person and moral manager identities is associated with lower negative workplace gossip. Leaders proficient in both dimensions experience the lowest levels of gossip, whereas those with a high moral person-low moral manager profile face less gossip than the inverse scenario. Additionally, this study examines perceived leader hypocrisy as a mediating mechanism, illuminating the potential drawbacks of moral and virtuous leadership.

Indexed as

CommunicationLeadershipMoralsWorkplaceHumansLeader hypocrisyMoral leadershipMoral managerMoral personNegative workplace gossip about supervisorResponse surface analysis

Identifiers

PMID42297951
PMCPMC13270019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.