ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning versus deep learning for screening ischemic stroke among asymptomatic population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke puts great health burden in public. However, the diagnosis is based on head CT or MRI scanning. We aim to develop classifier models to screen asymptomatic ischemic stroke based on clinical data without imaging. The subjects (age ≥ 20 years) were recruited into our study who attended health examination. We developed models to classify subjects with or without ischemic stroke using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and convolutional neural network (CNN). The candidate variables included sex, age, height, weight, blood pressure, blood lipid levels, fasting plasma glucose, hyperlipidemia, smoke history, alcohol drinking, diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart disease. Models included 141 subjects with small artery occlusion (SAO), 70 with large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and 211 controls. Classifier models to diagnose ischemic stroke, and further SAO and LAA, were developed with machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The best performance of model was based on RF, followed by CNN. The blood pressure, blood lipid and fasting plasma glucose were important factors and contributed to classifier models with machine learning algorithms. In conclusion, classifier models for ischemic stroke could be developed with machine learning and deep learning algorithms based on laboratory testing data without imaging. The models with RF showed best performance, followed by CNN. Those models may provide a tool for primary care doctors to screen asymptomatic stroke in general population, which could benefit to stroke patients from early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.