ArticleScientific reports2026
A decision-making framework integrating energy efficiency and climate resilience: evidence from ASEAN economies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancing energy efficiency while strengthening climate resilience has become a pivotal challenge for ASEAN economies exposed to rising energy demand and intensifying climate risks. Although previous studies have examined energy efficiency, renewable energy transition, and climate vulnerability, limited research has jointly integrated energy efficiency and climate resilience within a unified decision-making framework for ASEAN economies. This study addresses this gap by developing an integrated decision-support framework that combines the CRITIC objective weighting method and the CRADIS multi-criteria ranking approach. By tracking 10 ASEAN economies across various energy and environmental dimensions, this model provides insight into balancing short-term economic benefits with the long-term resilience of the energy system. The results reveal pronounced heterogeneity across countries. The Philippines achieves the highest integrated performance, followed by Myanmar and Singapore, while Brunei, Malaysia, and Laos show wider gaps from the ideal benchmark. The CRITIC results indicate that climate risk, policy readiness, renewable energy transition, and efficiency-related investment are key factors differentiating ASEAN economies. Sensitivity analysis using alternative MCDM models, including VIKOR, TOPSIS, WASPAS, and ARAS, supports the robustness of the CRITIC-CRADIS framework. The findings contribute theoretically by embedding climate resilience into energy-efficiency assessment and empirically by offering a transparent, replicable, and data-driven tool for country-level prioritization. From a policy perspective, the results suggest that ASEAN economies should adopt differentiated strategies, including renewable energy expansion, grid modernization, energy-efficiency standards, climate-risk screening, green finance, and regional coordination to support climate-resilient energy transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.