ArticleLeukemia2026
Prognostic and therapeutic implications of BRAF mutations in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRAF Mutations in Myeloid Neoplasms: Prevalence, Co-Mutation Landscape, and Clinical Outcomes-A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- scDNA: Single Cell DNA analysis software toolkit for subclonality discovery and assessment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations in the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway are recurrent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), primarily involving NRAS and KRAS. In contrast, mutations in the gene encoding an effector protein, BRAF, occur at relatively lower frequencies in AML and are associated with poor outcomes. To date, no comprehensive analysis has assessed the clinical and molecular characteristics of BRAF-mutated AML. In this study, we report the identification of canonical and non-canonical BRAF mutations in ~1% of 5779 consecutive clinically and molecularly fully annotated AML patients treated at two major United States Cancer Centers (50/5779 AML patients: 21 newly diagnosed AML; 9 relapsed/refractory; 20 newly diagnosed secondary AML). We performed single-cell multiomic analysis on a subset of AML samples. BRAF mutations were enriched in myelodysplasia-related AML (AML-MR), and most mutations were located outside the V600 hotspot. Single-cell multiomic profiling delineated BRAF mutation class-specific patterns of co-mutations, clonality, and immunophenotypes. Notably, BRAF mutations and other signaling co-mutation(s) could be found in the same cell, a finding that significantly diverges from prior studies of RAS-mutant AML. In this cohort, BRAF-mutant AML patients had poor overall survival with currently available treatments, including venetoclax-based regimens. Drug sensitivity data suggest possible avenues for targeted treatment of BRAF-mutated AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.