ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid fusion of E-nose and computer vision using optimized deep learning and machine learning for robust plant leaf recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fusion multi-sensory system with optimized deep learning and machine learning algorithms appeared to synergize difficult paradigms in precision agriculture and boost recognition of various plant species. In this study, an electronic nose (E-nose) system with eight MOS sensors and a computer vision platform were designed for constructing a large-scale data set of 26 various species of plant leaves collected during 2 years under different environmental conditions. After preprocessing functions, the E-nose data set consisted of 15,600 data points, while two-phase data augmentation expanded the image data set to 156,000 samples. Multiple machine learning models, including MLPs and 7 machine learning algorithms, were executed and optimized based on the E-nose dataset, where KNN with 97% accuracy and 5 ms response time per sample showed the highest accuracy in recognizing leaves. In parallel, six deep learning and vision transform algorithms were implemented, and hyperparameters such as batch size, learning rate, optimizer, and image size were updated during training. InceptionV3 demonstrated superior performance compared to others, with 99% accuracy, 0.2 loss, and 8 ms response time. Finally, a fusion model of E-nose and computer vision-based deep and machine learning algorithms was developed for robust performance of recognizing 26 different species of leaves. The fusion model could recognize leaves with 99.8% accuracy with a 10-ms response time. The proposed hybrid approach highlights the potential of multi-modal fusion for reliable, fast, and scalable solutions in smart agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.