Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42297874›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hybrid transformer-fuzzy framework for interpretable sentiment classification in deepfake social media content.

Ritu Gauraha, Ayush Kumar Agrawal, Parul Dubey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ritu GaurahaDepartment of Information Technology and Computer Science, Dr. C. V. Raman University, Bilaspur, India.
Ayush Kumar AgrawalDepartment of Information Technology and Computer Science, Dr. C. V. Raman University, Bilaspur, India.
Parul DubeySymbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. parul.dubey@sitnagpur.siu.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-6664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of deepfake content across social media, there is a growing challenge to trust online-especially when it comes to analyzing user attitude towards manipulative pieces of text. However, with millions of tweets generated every day, separating genuine sentiments from artificial narratives is a challenging area in sentiment analysis research. While previous models are often highly accurate, they depend on feature engineering and act like a black-box system, compromising interpretability and generalizability. This underscores the importance of having frameworks that are robust but also explainable. In the study, we evaluate the proposed model using TweepFake dataset which is publicly available with human and AI-generated tweets. Our study adopted the TweepFake dataset, which contains 25,572 tweets equally distributed between human and AI generated. Its balanced structure guarantees that the different methods of deepfake sentiment detection are assessed fairly. We present a hybrid method, which combines semantic richness (captured through Transformer-based contextual embeddings) with human-readable explanations based on fuzzy membership rules embedded in a Fuzzy Rule-Based System (FRBS). Its novelty is in integrating state-of-the-art contextual modeling with symbolic reasoning for interpretability. Under 10-fold cross-validation, performance was evaluated through Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, Jaccard Coefficient & MCC and Inference time. Experimental results demonstrate that the new framework has 97.0% accuracy and F1-score, with stable performance over epochs and more explainability compared to baseline models. The model outperforms the RoBERTa baseline, achieving a 1.6% improvement in accuracy.

Indexed as

Fuzzy LogicSocial MediaAlgorithmsHumansSemanticsDeepfake detectionExplainable AIFuzzy rule-based systemSentiment analysisTransformer

Identifiers

PMID42297874
PMCPMC13534421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.