ArticleScientific reports2026
Restorative effects of plant landscapes under different weather and phenology conditions: evidence from EEG and psychological responses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on plant landscapes reveal a high degree of complexity in how environmental factors interact with individuals' psychophysiological recovery processes, particularly the moderating role of individual differences in recovery effects remains to be systematically and thoroughly explored through empirical research. Therefore, we established a three-dimensional experimental framework of "weather-plant phenology-plant type," integrating EEG and psychological assessment methods to evaluate psychophysiological recovery effects of different plant landscape conditions on individuals. We also incorporated individual different variables such as personality traits and weather preferences to explore their moderating mechanisms on recovery effects. Results indicate: (1) Regardless of weather conditions, blooming plant landscapes significantly enhance physiological (Pa, Pm) and psychological recovery levels, while recovery effects in senescent landscapes vary depending on plant type; (2) Both neuroticism and extraversion significantly modulated the restorative effects of plant landscapes. Neuroticism exhibited a nonlinear dynamic pattern of "promotion-optimal-inhibition"; (3) Personality traits were the key factor influencing restorative differences (highest Mantel's r), with explanatory power significantly exceeding that of weather preference and gender. We deepen our understanding of plant landscape recovery mechanisms through multifactor interaction and individual variation lens, providing theoretical foundations and practical references for urban green space planning and the scientific construction of healing urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.