Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42297843›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A comprehensive global dataset of river nutrient concentrations, loads and streamflow.

Jordan Peters, Alasdair Noble, Crile Doscher, Richard McDowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan PetersSoil and Physical Science, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Alasdair NobleNew Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Crile DoscherSoil and Physical Science, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Richard McDowellSoil and Physical Science, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand. richard.mcdowell@lincoln.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to high quality river water quality data is crucial for environmental research and informing policymakers about management decisions. Currently, publicly available river data is spread across several large national and international databases and sparse in both spatial and temporal coverage in much of the world. In response to this, we produced three related data outputs which we have combined into a single comprehensive dataset: (1) a global dataset of total nitrogen, phosphorus and streamflow measurements compiled from seventeen river databases, containing over around 20,000 unique monitoring sites for total nitrogen, 40,000 sites for total phosphorus and 32,000 streamflow sites, (2) a set of 1,292 total nitrogen sites and 2,302 phosphorus sites with daily water quality values from a concentration estimation model and (3) global estimates of nutrient loads and concentrations produced by extrapolating the second output to areas with low data coverage using random forests. The dataset is intended to aid in future hydrological research and can also be used to advise on local river management, identify hotspots which may be prone to high nutrient loads, and compute global nutrient fluxes form land to sea.

Identifiers

PMID42297843
PMCPMC13631266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.