ArticleNature communications2026
Speech as a biomarker for supported diagnosis of major depressive disorder using self-supervised representations.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) urgently requires objective biomarkers for clinical translation. In this study, we established a multicenter cohort to date (N = 1,816; comprising 910 MDD patients and 906 healthy control subjects), using 23,608 standardized speech samples. Based on 6,373 acoustic-prosodic features, we develop a deep learning framework that employs a self-supervised architecture to leverage speech biomarkers. We perform a systematic comparative analysis among pretrained foundation models, including WavLM and HuBERT, and traditional acoustic features extracted from openSMILE. Model performance is evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Our framework achieves an AUC of 0.932 in internal validation (n = 333), significantly outperforming conventional methods, while maintaining efficacy in external validation (n = 160, AUC = 0.879). Self-supervised representations demonstrate robust diagnostic accuracy compared to other models. Leveraging the large speech biomarker dataset, our findings provide a rapid, cost-effective, and non-invasive approach for assisted depression assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.