ReviewAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026
Motor Disorders in Autism: From Comorbidity to Core Criterion.
Review in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While repetitive movements are recognized as a diagnostic hallmark of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in frameworks such as the DSM and ICD, other motor disturbances, including gait atypicalities and postural control difficulties, have historically been overlooked or framed as secondary comorbidities. This discrepancy persists despite growing evidence that motor signs in ASD are fundamental rather than incidental. Some of these motor and gait signs may be discernable early and could potentially forecast subsequent communication outcomes in certain cohorts. The current focus on observable behaviors in diagnostic systems may thus benefit from integration of motor dimensions, which could enhance early identification and support tailored interventions. Available experimental and clinical findings converge to indicate that motor dysfunctions in ASD are neither epiphenomena nor peripheral. They map onto cerebellar and basal ganglia dysfunction, impaired multisensory integration, and disrupted emotion-motor coupling that may impact cognitive and social outcomes. Future directions must go beyond the current phenotypical characterization of ASD. Motor screening could be integrated into early pediatric surveillance, and interdisciplinary motor-based interventions embedded into individualized care. More factually, we contend that motor and gait signs, beyond restricted and repetitive movements, should be incorporated into future revisions of DSM and ICD as diagnostic criteria for ASD. This would not only improve sensitivity to early and mild ASD phenotypes but also realign autism diagnosis with its neurological foundation. Recognizing motor specificities as an integrated part of ASD demands a paradigm shift: pediatricians and psychiatrists must embrace an embodied, motor-informed model of autism, bridging it with neurology to transform both diagnosis and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.