Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42297611›Full record

ArticleHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2026

[Expert consensus on the "Four-Level and Dual-Axis" comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic system for prosthetic rehabilitation of oral diseases].

Expert Group of “Expert Consensus on the ‘Four-Level and Dual-Axis’ Comprehensive Diagnostic and Therapeutic System for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Oral Diseases”

Abstract readConsensus StatementEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Expert Group of “Expert Consensus on the ‘Four-Level and Dual-Axis’ Comprehensive Diagnostic and Therapeutic System for Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Oral Diseases”

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, prosthodontics has adhered to a clinical diagnosis and treatment model centered on "tooth defects, partial edentulism, and complete edentulism", which show insufficient alignment with the modern "biopsychosocial" medical model. The demand of high-quality medical services continues to increase with the nation's growing prosperity and the continuous extension of average life expectancy. Facing these heightened medical demands, particularly the challenges of oral frailty and multimorbidity in an aging society, the traditional diagnostic and therapeutic system for prosthodontics increasingly reveals limitations, including insufficient information coverage, obscuring the underlying etio-logy, the neglect of individual psychological needs, and a lack of holistic consideration for multimorbidity. This consensus proposes the "Four-Level and Dual-Axis" comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic system for prosthetic rehabilitation of oral diseases to address these bottlenecks in disciplinary development. This system classifies the diagnostic scope from micro to macro into four functional levels of "tooth-pulp", "dentition-occlusion", "occlusion-temporomandibular joint", and "maxillofacial-systemic" emphasizing the pathological cascade reactions between levels and a bidirectional diagnostic logic. Simultaneously, it introduces a subjective-objective dual-axis assessment model comprising "individual psychology and prosthetic needs (axis A)" and "etiology and patho-anatomical diagnosis (axis B)," achieving an integration of medical rationality and humanistic care. By reconstructing diagnostic logic and implementing standardized sequential treatment pathways, this consensus aims to facilitate the continuous transition of prosthodontics toward the "biopsychosocial" medical model, shifting from a "prosthesis-centered" approach to a "patient-centered and disease-focused" model of precision personalized prosthetic rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Mouth DiseasesProsthodonticsHumansdiagnostic and therapeutic systemdiscipline classificationFour-Level and Dual-Axis

Identifiers

PMID42297611
PMCPMC13268854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.