ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
The Six R's of Management Reasoning for Subintern Education.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManagement reasoning (MR), the component of clinical reasoning concerned with treatment planning, patient preferences and resource considerations, develops later than diagnostic reasoning and remains underemphasised in medical education. Despite calls to explicitly teach MR, instructional strategies remain scarce. APPROACH: We developed a mnemonic, the "Six R's of Management Reasoning," and implemented a 90-min workshop grounded in social constructivism. Between July 2023 and December 2024, we taught 22 sessions to 119 subinterns. Students used the mnemonic to collaboratively construct management plans and admission orders through case-based activities and facilitated discussions. EVALUATION: Using three levels of Kirkpatrick's model-reaction, learning and behaviour-we assessed the workshop through IRB-approved surveys, tests and workplace assessments. Postworkshop and postrotation surveys showed significant increases in students' confidence and ability to apply MR (all p < 0.001). Knowledge test scores improved from 81.7% to 93.3% (p < 0.001, Hedges's g = 1.20). Faculty assessments confirmed students' strengths in risk calculation and shared decision-making, though some students struggled with applying high-value care and citing evidence. IMPLICATIONS: The "Six R's of Management Reasoning" provided a practical tool for MR development, and activities selected based on social constructivism were effective and well received. Mixed performance in clinical settings suggests that MR requires longitudinal reinforcement, repeated patient encounters and continued mentorship beyond a single workshop. This approach is feasible for broader implementation and may serve as a foundation for intentionally integrating MR across the medical education continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.