ArticleBMJ open2026
Perceptions of healthcare professionals and community members on acute febrile illness management in Maputo and Quelimane City: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute febrile illness is a major cause of morbidity and healthcare seeking in sub-Saharan Africa, including Mozambique. However, few studies have explored the perceptions and practices related to clinical management of acute febrile illness. Our aim was to understand the perceptions, knowledge and practices of healthcare professionals and community members regarding the management of acute febrile illness.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted using a thematic analysis approach. Eight focus group discussions (FGDs) and three in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted in two Mozambican provinces across four healthcare facilities. Purposive sampling was used to select participants, comprising both healthcare professionals and community members. Data were analysed thematically through manual coding, applying inductive and deductive approaches, in line with established qualitative analytical frameworks.
resultsThe study included a total of 60 participants, 28 healthcare professionals who participated in FGDs (25) and IDIs (3) and 32 community members who participated in FGDs. Major causes of fever, according to healthcare professionals, were upper and lower respiratory infections, malaria, diarrhoeal diseases and COVID-19. The diagnostic approach for febrile patients primarily included screening, malaria testing and other non-specific investigations depending on availability at health facilities. Antibiotics and antipyretics were the most commonly prescribed treatments. The healthcare professionals reported a decrease in prescribing antimalarials due to extensive training on malaria case management. In contrast, community members reported relying primarily on home-based and traditional practices to treat acute febrile illness before seeking care at health facilities. These practices are related to sociocultural habits, such as the use of traditional medicine and self-medication. The main barriers to seeking care at health facilities were the perception of poor quality of care, long waiting times, cultural beliefs and lack of medicines.
conclusionProper management of non-malarial febrile illness remains a major challenge for both healthcare professionals and communities. Training, adherence to case management protocols and efforts to change behaviours to mitigate harmful sociocultural practices are urgently necessary to improve febrile illness management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.