ArticleBMJ open2026
Use of case-based, problem-based and team-based learning in public health education - a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesActive learning strategies, including case-based learning (CBL), problem-based learning (PBL) and team-based learning (TBL), have been extensively studied in clinical and basic science education; however, their application in public health programmes remains under-explored. Public health professionals address population-level challenges that differ substantially from clinical practice, making it necessary to evaluate whether these pedagogies are effective in this field. This review examines how CBL, PBL and TBL have been used in public health education and what outcomes have been reported.
designScoping review was conducted using the Levac and Colquhoun framework, an adaptation of Arksey and O'Malley's approach. DATA SOURCES, ELIGIBILITY AND EXTRACTION: PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2025. Eligible studies included those involving students enrolled in undergraduate or postgraduate public health programmes, such as bachelor's or master's programmes in public health, epidemiology and biostatistics, global health, community medicine or health policy as well as employees working in public health-related fields. Data were extracted using a predefined template capturing study characteristics, population characteristics, student satisfaction and study objectives. All articles were thematically analysed.
conclusionActive learning methods enhance critical thinking and problem-solving in public health education but face implementation barriers, including faculty training requirements and resource constraints. Future research should examine long-term outcomes and the integration of emerging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.