ArticleBMJ global health2026
Gi4SaveLife: a community-led model for sustainable voluntary blood donation in rural Sierra Leone.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sierra Leone faces critical blood shortages reliant on family replacement and paid donors, contributing to high maternal mortality. Traditional top-down blood drives have failed to build sustainable voluntary donor bases due to mistrust and logistical barriers. We developed 'Gi4SaveLife', a community-led model to foster local ownership and sustainable donation. Implemented in Kono and Kenema districts, this quality improvement initiative established community 'hubs' led by local volunteers responsible for peer-to-peer education and mobilisation. We conducted a baseline survey to identify barriers, followed by monthly blood drives using non-monetary incentives. Data on collection volumes, donor demographics and costs were tracked over 8 months. The initiative collected 539 units from 376 unique donors, moving from zero voluntary donations at baseline to a consistent supply. Crucially, 43% (161) were repeat donations, indicating a committed donor pool. The cost per unit decreased by 40% compared with standard NGO-led models. Key motivators included altruism (71%) and social recognition (52%). Gi4SaveLife demonstrates that a community-led approach, grounded in ownership and trust, can establish a cost-effective, sustainable pipeline of voluntary donors in low-resource settings. This model offers a scalable framework to bolster national blood transfusion services by bridging the gap between communities and health facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.