ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Accuracy of a Deep Learning Model in Intracardiac Echocardiography.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is widely used during electrophysiology and structural heart procedures; however, image interpretation remains operator-dependent and procedural views are not standardized. Although artificial intelligence has been increasingly applied to transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, applications to ICE remain limited.
objectivesThe objective of the study was to develop and evaluate Auto-Contour, a deep-learning pipeline for multistructure semantic segmentation of ICE anatomy and assess its feasibility for real-time procedural guidance.
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, 5,496 deidentified ICE cine loops from 249 procedures of unique patients, including routine clinical cases and the ViewFlex™ X first-in-human study, were analyzed. ICE experts classified each cine into 1 of 20 procedural views and annotated key anatomic structures, including the left atrium, left atrial appendage, pulmonary vein ostia, valves, cusps, papillary muscles, and left ventricle, at end-systole, and end-diastole, yielding 65,117 segmentations. A deep-learning segmentation model was trained using patient-level splits, standard augmentations, and early stopping.
resultsSegmentation performance was highest for larger cardiac chambers, with Dice scores of 0.94 for the left atrium and 0.82 for the left ventricle, and corresponding 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance values of 1.18 mm and 3.27 mm. Smaller structures also demonstrated acceptable performance, including the left atrial appendage, pulmonary veins, papillary muscles, and aortic cusps. The mean per-frame inference time was <0.03 seconds.
conclusionsAuto-Contour demonstrated robust multistructure segmentation of ICE anatomy with real-time inference, supporting prospective evaluation of artificial intelligence-assisted ICE for procedural standardization, efficiency, and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.