Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296590›Full record

ArticleChild abuse & neglect2026

A taxonomy of states' approaches to plans of safe care.

Margaret Lloyd Sieger, Sarah F Loch, Barbara Andraka-Christou, Bradley D Stein, Phoebe Levine, Lauren Caton, Stephen W Patrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret Lloyd SiegerUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine, Department of Population Health, Kansas City, KS, United States of America. Electronic address: msieger@kumc.edu.
Sarah F LochEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Barbara Andraka-ChristouUniversity of Central Florida, School of Global Health Management & Informatics, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
Bradley D SteinRAND Pittsburgh, United States of America.
Phoebe LevineRAND Pittsburgh, United States of America.
Lauren CatonEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Stephen W PatrickEmory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory Center for Child Health Policy, Atlanta, GA, United States of America; Emory University, School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Funding

Improving outcomes for substance-affected families in the child welfare systemR01DA056436 · NIDA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen W Patrick · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Public Policy & Health for Substance Exposed Infant-Mother DyadsK01DA058060 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Margaret Lloyd Sieger · 2023 to 2026
$702k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA058060NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2016 Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act amended the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), expanding requirements for the development of state-specific Plans of Safe Care (POSC) for prenatal substance exposure. POSCs were intended to amplify existing efforts to include maternal referral to treatment and services in addition to infant safety planning. States were left to re-operationalize their own POSC procedures, including the extent to which the POSC process involved the child welfare system. We reviewed state statutes, regulations, and reports to create a taxonomy of state POSC approaches based on their relationship with child protective services (CPS) and healthcare systems.

methodsWe evaluated state POSC-related statutes, regulations, and federally mandated child welfare state reports (Annual Progress & Services Reports, Child & Family Services Plans, & CAPTA plans) for all 50 states and Washington, D.C. from 2012 to 2024. Using artificial intelligence-assisted text extraction and subject matter expert textual interpretation, we reviewed 634 documents and more than 123,000 pages of text. Through iterative categorization, we developed a five-domain POSC taxonomy, organizing POSC policies by their proximity to and engagement with CPS and healthcare systems. We then identified the number of states with POSC policies in each domain and the timing of implementation.

resultsNearly all states had implemented their POSC by 2024. Our final taxonomy consisted of the following domains: (a) All CPS Referrals (26%), (b) Open Case Only (28%), (c) Alternative Response (26%), (d) Hospital-initiated (16%), and (e) Dual Pathways, that uses type of substance exposure to determine receipt of a Hospital-initiated POSC or traditional CPS response (14%). Eighty percent (80%) of states restrict POSC access to families already subject to CPS reporting or investigation.

conclusionsDespite federal intent to broaden public health supports, state POSC policies largely reinforce existing CPS practices rather than offering proactive, non-punitive interventions. The proposed taxonomy offers a framework for future comparative research, policy evaluation, and reform efforts.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Protective ServicesChild WelfareSubstance-Related DisordersChildFemaleHumansPregnancyState GovernmentUnited StatesChild welfare policyPlans of safe carePolicy scanPrenatal substance exposure

Identifiers

PMID42296590
PMCPMC13551497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.