ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Predicting Laboratory Test Ordering in Emergency Departments Using Integrated Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records: Machine Learning Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Laboratory testing is a cornerstone of diagnostic decision-making in emergency departments (EDs), yet its overuse contributes substantially to unnecessary health care costs and inefficiencies. Predictive approaches that leverage electronic health record data may help optimize and guide more appropriate test use. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models that predict laboratory test use during ED visits by integrating structured clinical data and unstructured text from electronic health records. Methods: We analyzed 13,115 adult ED visits from the 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department dataset. Structured predictors included demographics, vital signs, insurance status, and medical history, while unstructured data from chief complaints and injury descriptions were encoded using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers-based embeddings. Four model configurations were developed: structured-only, unstructured-only, combined structured and unstructured data, and an ensemble (mean probability) approach. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The combined model achieved the highest predictive performance (AUC=0.83), outperforming both the structured-only model (AUC=0.78) and the unstructured-only model (AUC=0.74). The ensemble model also performed well but did not exceed the combined model. Key predictors of laboratory testing included older age, ambulance arrival, abnormal vital signs, and chronic comorbidities, whereas injury-related visits were associated with a lower likelihood of testing. Conclusions: Integrating structured and unstructured electronic health record data improves the prediction of laboratory test use in ED settings. These findings support the development of data-driven clinical decision support tools aimed at enhancing diagnostic efficiency and reducing unnecessary testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.