Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296530›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Integration of Federated Learning and Blockchain in Health Care: Tutorial on Medical Data, Architectures, Privacy, Security, and Regulatory Compliance.

Yahya Shahsavari, Yaser Baseri, Abdelhakim Hafid, Oussama Abderrahmane Dambri, Dimitrios Makrakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Future of xenotransplantation in Korea.Clinical transplantation and research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advancements in AI-driven drug sensitivity testing research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yahya ShahsavariDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, Université de Montréal, 2900 Bd Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 5144514964.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3223-1260
Yaser BaseriDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, Université de Montréal, 2900 Bd Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 5144514964.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-5184
Abdelhakim HafidDepartment of Computer Science and Operations Research, Université de Montréal, 2900 Bd Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada, 1 5144514964.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-7344
Oussama Abderrahmane DambriSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4420-3742
Dimitrios MakrakisSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8885-3196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain technology, and health care represents one of the most transformative yet technically challenging frontiers in computational medicine. As health care systems adopt data-driven paradigms for precision medicine and clinical decision support, the need for secure, privacy-preserving, and collaborative learning frameworks has become critical. This tutorial introduces a comprehensive, clinically oriented, and compliance-aware framework integrating federated learning (FL) and blockchain for secure and privacy-preserving health care analytics. FL enables collaborative training across distributed institutions without raw data sharing, in alignment with privacy regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, FL remains vulnerable to model poisoning and gradient leakage. To address these risks, we introduce blockchain-based FL (BCFL), which leverages blockchain's immutable ledger and decentralized consensus to enhance trust, verifiability, and auditability. The tutorial's main contributions include (1) a taxonomy of diverse medical data types and their FL requirements; (2) three integration architectures (fully coupled, semicoupled, and loosely coupled) analyzed for security, scalability, and regulatory compliance; (3) a security analysis of health care-specific vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies using advanced cryptography, such as zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption, and differential privacy; and (4) a regulatory compliance framework addressing HIPAA, GDPR, and United States Food and Drug Administration guidelines for AI-enabled medical devices. We demonstrate BCFL's relevance across major health care applications, including disease prediction, medical imaging, patient monitoring, and drug discovery, and highlight emerging research directions such as quantum-resilient cryptography, scalable interoperability, and automated compliance. This tutorial serves as a foundational resource for advancing secure, compliant, and collaborative AI in health care; fostering privacy-preserving analytics; and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BlockchainConfidentialityDelivery of Health CareDigital HealthFederated LearningComputer SecurityHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansUnited Statesblockchain technologyhealth care securityHIPAA complianceIoT health caremachine learningmedical data privacy

Identifiers

PMID42296530
PMCPMC13268642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.