ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
A survey of models composed of graph neural networks and large language models for molecular science.
Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven risk prediction of polypharmacy in older adults: current advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationGraphs have been demonstrated to have an impressive ability to keep the structural and semantic properties of chemical compounds and are therefore widely used in molecular modeling. Moreover, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved outstanding results in predicting molecular properties and generating textual descriptions given graphs or texts, respectively. Recently, some mathematical models have been presented for molecular science applications, which combine the GNNs ability to capture the structural and semantic information and the generative ability of LLMs. However, these models are dispersed across the literature and vary in architecture, input-output design, and application scope, making it difficult to systematically compare them or to identify suitable approaches for specific research objectives.
resultsThis paper classifies recent GNN-LLM models and summarizes them with the aim of providing guidance for research involving their use or the development of new models. We present tables that depict the properties and parameters of the models, as well as their associated chemical computational applications. In addition, a new model classification is presented to help researchers define the models they use or future ones. Finally, we quantitatively compare these models based on their reported experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.