Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296256›Full record

ReviewAdvances in skin & wound care2026

Perioperative Applications of Electrical Stimulation in Flap Surgeries: Mechanisms and Benefits.

Meijun Jiang, Shaoyun Zhang, Cong Xiao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in skin & wound care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meijun JiangDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Hospital of Mianyang Sichuan Mental Health Center, Mianyang, China.
Shaoyun Zhang
Cong Xiao

Funding

Health Commission of Mianyang City No. 202007Mianyang Science and Technology Bureau 2022ZYDF087The Third Hospital of Mianyang No. 202101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the roles and applications of electrical stimulation in flap transplantation, addressing its potential to reduce flap necrosis. DATA SOURCES: Medical textbooks and a literature search were conducted in databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and relevant surgical journals. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were screened using keywords including electrical stimulation, flap transplantation, angiogenesis, vasodilation, antibacterial, vasopasm, inflammation, wound healing, cell migration, and cell proliferation. Articles in which the title and/or abstract contained these key words were included in the review. More than 120 journal research articles met the criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Research highlighted the benefits and molecular mechanisms of electrical stimulation on the healing progress of flap transplantation, which underwent a full-text review and summarization. DATA SYNTHESIS: Classify and descriptively summarize the articles based on perioperative factors closely related to flap survival. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are discussed, alongside their clinical significance.

conclusionsPreoperative electrical stimulation fosters angiogenesis and new blood vessel growth, whereas postoperative stimulation aids in infection control, edema reduction, and overall wound healing. Electrical stimulation shows significant promise in improving outcomes of flap surgeries.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyPerioperative CareSurgical FlapsHumansWound Healingangiogenesiselectrical stimulationflap necrosisflap transplantationmicrocirculationwound repair

Identifiers

PMID42296256
PMCPMC13252976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.