Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Co-design of a model for learning conversations about ongoing patient care between medical supervisors and trainees in the rural generalist settings: A research protocol.

Linda Furness, Janani Pinidiyapathirage, Matthew French, James Ware, Liam Weber, Brendan Carrigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linda FurnessGriffith University, Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-6430
Janani PinidiyapathirageGriffith University, Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew FrenchGriffith University, Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
James WareDarling Downs Health, Kingaroy, Queensland, Australia.
Liam WeberDarling Downs Health, Warwick, Queensland, Australia.
Brendan CarriganGriffith University, Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn rural generalist clinical settings, medical trainees routinely assess patients and discuss their findings with supervisors to plan ongoing care. These interactions termed 'learning conversations', serve as important opportunities for workplace-based learning and clinical decision making. However, preliminary evidence and stakeholder feedback indicate a lack of shared understanding regarding how these conversations should be structured, facilitated, and optimised. This study aims to observe current practices, identify supervisor and trainee learning needs, and co-design a model of learning conversations that enhances educational value and supports safe, effective patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use an exploratory sequential mixed methods design structured around the 3Cs of co-design (Co-define, Co-design, Co-refine). Phase 1 (co-define) will involve qualitative observation and audio-recording of learning conversations across two rural hospitals to characterise current practice and inform a protype model. In Phase 2 (co-design), supervisor and trainee focus groups will explore perceived needs, expectations, and feedback on the prototype model. A national online survey of rural supervisors and trainees will further inform model refinement. Phase 3 (co-refine) will incorporate national stakeholder input through a workshop, followed by feasibility testing of the refined model during a pilot simulation at a Rural Clinical School. Outcome data will focus on model usability, perceived relevance, applicability across contexts, and users' experiences of employing the model during simulated learning conversations. DISCUSSION: This study will produce a stakeholder-informed model that responds to the specific learning and clinical needs of rural generalist practice. By embedding co-design throughout the research process, the resulting model is expected to strengthen learning conversations, optimise trainee learning, and enhance the quality and safety of patient care. The findings have potential applicability across broader health professional training contexts and can support workforce development in rural healthcare settings.

Indexed as

CommunicationLearningPatient CareRural Health ServicesFocus GroupsHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID42296156
PMCPMC13268152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.