ArticlePloS one2026
A scoping review of force plates in female soccer: The utility, existing practice and identification of knowledge Gaps.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accuracy, Reliability and Waveform-Level Agreement Between the Impera Force Platform and a Criterion-Standard Force Plate.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female soccer has grown exponentially with increasing funding, participation and competition. Force plates enable high resolution force-time assessment using isometric and dynamic tasks for acute or longitudinal monitoring, and profiling performance and injury risk. However, more research has been conducted in male soccer players compared to females with the utility of force plates in female soccer yet to be reviewed. The purpose of this scoping review is to review existing research using force plates in female soccer describing the utility of force plates, methods used, reported metrics and to identify gaps in our current understanding. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and Cinahl using the following search terms: "girl*" OR "female*" OR "women*" AND "football*" OR "soccer*" AND "force plat*" AND " jump" OR "isometric" AND ("multi joint*" OR "single joint*" OR "plantar flex*" OR "knee*" OR "hamstring*" OR "knee flex*" OR "hip exten*" OR "posterior chain*" OR "drop*" OR "rebound*" OR "stiffness*" "power*" OR "strength*" OR "counter*movement*" OR "dominant*" OR "non dominant*"). Sixty-three studies were eligible with most studies investigating senior elite players during dynamic tasks. The bilateral countermovement jump was the most common test followed by pre-planned change of direction and the isometric mid-thigh pull. Force plates were mostly used for performance assessment/ sex comparison research designs, followed by acute monitoring. Peak force was the most reported metric across all studies and jump height was most reported in studies investigating jumping. Most researchers used force plates in laboratory settings relating to change of direction and landing tasks with limited research conducted in applied settings and at youth level. Therefore, future researchers should focus on field-based assessments aiming to provide benchmarks and prospectively track players for injury as to support the health and performance of female soccer players at all levels of competition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.