Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296126›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Revisiting the role of structural connectivity-based parcellation in thalamic nuclei segmentation: Benchmarking against recent state-of-the-art methods.

Daniel H Nguyen, Debottama Das, Ali Bilgin, Dianne Patterson, Matthew Hook, Chris Butson, Alberto Cacciola, Vinod Kumar Jangir, Manojkumar Saranathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel H NguyenUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Debottama DasDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3003-0730
Ali BilginDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4196-4036
Dianne PattersonUniversity of Arizona at Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Matthew HookDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, GainesvilleFlorida, United States of America.
Chris ButsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, GainesvilleFlorida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2319-1263
Alberto CacciolaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-4116
Vinod Kumar JangirMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.
Manojkumar SaranathanDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9020-9948

Funding

Next-Generation Thalamic Nuclei Visualization and Segmentation MethodsR01EB032674 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Manojkumar Saranathan · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leveraging diffusion tractography, connectivity-based parcellation (CBP) is one of the oldest methods for thalamic nuclei segmentation. The goal of this work was to reassess CBP using higher spatial resolution diffusion MRI data and reconstruction algorithms, and to compare it with recent state-of-the-art methods for thalamic nuclei segmentation. Furthermore, these methods were systematically evaluated against three histological atlases and one functional MRI-based atlas to examine their relative anatomical similarities and differences. High resolution diffusion and T1-weighted MRI data from 67 healthy individuals in the Human Connectome Project Young Adult database were analyzed. CBP was performed using probabilistic tractography with cortical targets derived from combining labels of the Human Connectome Project Multi-Modal Parcellation 1.0 atlas into 8, 11, and 23 regions. Results were compared against three recent methods: orientation distribution function clustering (ODF), track density imaging (TDI), and structural MRI-based segmentation. Group level analyses were conducted in the Montreal Neurological Institute space, and Dice overlap coefficients were calculated using four atlases (three histological, one functional). CBP results using newer data and methods were still remarkably similar to the original CBP parcellation results. Across atlases, a consistent hierarchy was observed: HIPS-THOMAS performed best, followed by TDI, ODF, and CBP (Kendall's W = 1.00, p = 0.007). Histological atlases showed strong mutual agreement (Pearson r = 0.71-0.85), whereas the Zhang atlas demonstrated lower concordance (Pearson r = 0.51-0.63). Despite methodological advances, CBP remains constrained in its ability to delineate thalamic nuclei with histological accuracy. By contrast, structural and diffusion microstructural approaches provided better nuclear localization. These findings highlight the need for hybrid workflows that integrate structural and diffusion-based information to enable more reliable thalamic segmentation for neuroscience research.

Indexed as

ConnectomeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedThalamic NucleiAdultAlgorithmsBenchmarkingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42296126
PMCPMC13268177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.