ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Establishing research and translation priorities and care pathways for families where a parent lives with mental ill health.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Service users and carers have recently had input into establishing mental health research and translation priorities in Australia. This study extends that work to include the voice of those with lived experience of parental mental ill health. Although, parental mental ill health is a global public health issue there is a substantial gap in knowing the research and implementation priorities for parents and their families. This study sought to establish the priorities that families with lived experience of parental mental ill health have for support and intervention, along with what social factors they identify as important to positive and negative outcomes. There were seventy-eight respondents to two open-ended survey questions related to mental health care improvements and social determinants impacting mental health. Respondents were parents with lived experience of mental ill health (n = 43), partners of parents (n = 11), family members (e.g., aunty, sibling; n = 14), and adult children of a parent (n = 10). Approximately 80% described their gender as female and 27 contributors reported having multiple lived experiences/roles (for example, as a parent and an adult child). More than 500 responses to the two open ended questions were entered into Leximancer 5 analysis software. The key priorities were: strengthening family member relationships; supporting children earlier and providing whole of family/group approaches; the need for practical, emotional and social elements of support within families and at home to address stress; increased well-being, and improved family cohesion and communication. Social priorities were access for childcare, community groups, therapy, and respite care, with an emphasis on relieving pressure points and promoting family cohesion. Intergenerational trauma and young caregivers were also highlighted, as were social determinants including reducing poverty and improving finances along with housing stability. These findings form priorities for future mental health research and have already led to the establishment of implementation actions for guiding future efforts by governments, service providers and researchers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.