Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42296024›Full record

ArticleSleep2026

Defining the hospital night: deriving and validating electronic health record-based measures of the inpatient sleep experience.

Sullafa Kadura, Samia H Lopa, Mark Oldham, Lisa Pink, Diego R Mazzotti, Sanjay R Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sullafa KaduraDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-6382
Samia H LopaDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Mark OldhamDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0981-7522
Lisa PinkUniversity of Rochester Health Lab, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Diego R MazzottiDivision of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-9199
Sanjay R PatelCenter for Sleep and Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-5172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesTo identify electronic health record (EHR)-derived sleep measures associated with the inpatient sleep experience during hospitalization.

methodsWe recruited 247 inpatients who completed the Karolinska Sleep Diary and the Potential Hospital Sleep Disruptions and Noise Questionnaire. Using EHR data, we derived three measures: longest uninterrupted sleep opportunity (LUSO), total uninterrupted sleep opportunity (TUSO), and patient-staff interactions (PSIs) calculated within two timeframes: a fixed window (23:00-06:00) and a patient-defined window (lights out to final awakening). We examined the associations between EHR-derived measures calculated within each window and sleep experience measures.

resultsSleep duration correlated more strongly with patient-defined TUSO (r = 0.63, p < .001) than with fixed TUSO (r = 0.27, p < .001). Ratings of sleep continuity, refreshing sleep, and sound sleep were also associated with patient-defined TUSO (TUSO r = 0.15-0.23; all p < .05), supporting its construct validity as an indicator of sleep quality. Sleep disruption ratings were associated with EHR-derived measures of overnight activity, including PSI counts (r = 0.35 within fixed windows vs. r = 0.29 within patient-defined windows; both p < .001).

conclusionsEHR-derived measures of sleep opportunity and interruption provide scalable tools for characterizing the inpatient sleep experience using routinely collected clinical data. Measures calculated within patient-defined windows show stronger associations with sleep duration and quality, while PSIs calculated within both window types show similar associations with perceived sleep disruption from overnight clinical workflows. These complementary approaches may inform strategies to reduce unnecessary nighttime disturbances and improve sleep in hospitalized patients. Statement of Significance Poor sleep is a near-universal complaint among hospitalized patients, yet methods for measuring inpatient sleep remain limited. Our study demonstrates that measures of sleep opportunity and disruption can be derived from routinely documented data in the electronic health record (EHR). Measures calculated within patient-defined sleep windows show stronger alignment with sleep duration and quality, whereas measures derived from both patient-defined and fixed workflow-defined windows capture sleep disruption associated with patient-staff interactions. Knowledge gaps remain in determining how these measures relate to patient recovery, safety, and satisfaction. Future work should investigate how EHR-based sleep measures can be leveraged to facilitate system-level interventions aimed at improving sleep in hospital settings.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHospitalizationInpatientsSleepAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleep DurationSleep QualitySurveys and Questionnaireselectronic health recordhospitalinpatient sleeppatient–staff interactionsleep disruptionsleep opportunityTUSO

Identifiers

PMID42296024
PMCPMC13658259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.