ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare providers regarding snakebite envenomation: a cross-sectional study among Sub-saharan african countries.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSnakebite envenomation remains a critical health challenge across the culturally and ecologically diverse sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This study examined healthcare providers' (HCPs') knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP), and their determinants towards snakebite envenomation.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted across nine SSA countries using the validated Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Snake Envenomation - Healthcare Providers Questionnaire (KAPSE-HCPQ). The fractional logistic regression was conducted to identify the factors associated with KAP.
resultsA total of 3,544 HCPs were enrolled through professional and digital networks. General practitioners represented approximately half of the participants (50.1%), whereas toxicologists were 3.2%. Considerable variations were reported across sub-Saharan countries. Uganda and Sierra Leone attained perfect median knowledge scores (100%, range: 93-100, 73-100, respectively) yet both demonstrated marked deficiencies in practice (range: 0-25% and 0-75%, respectively). Attitude scores ranged from the lowest in Ethiopia (79%, range: 75-85%) to the highest in Uganda (91%, range: 87-95%). Higher knowledge was significantly associated with advanced training, antivenom availability, curricular inclusion of toxicology, and self-study. Positive attitudes were significantly associated with prior clinical exposure, faculty-based education, informal information sources, and participants' countries. HCPs demonstrated incorrect practices, such as applying a tourniquet above the bite site, attempting to suck out the venom, incising the bite wound, and asking to run to the nearest health facility, which may accelerate the systemic venom spread. In contrast, pharmacists and HCPs unaware of management guidelines demonstrated poorer practices.
conclusionThe study identifies a substantial gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice among HCPs across SSA, with variations by country, profession, training, and resource availability. Urgent interventions training, protocol standardization, and reliable antivenom supply are required to improve snakebite outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.