ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Updates in ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventions.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) has evolved from a diagnostic tool into a key modality for guiding minimally invasive interventions across the musculoskeletal system. Its real-time imaging, portability, and absence of ionizing radiation make it a cost-effective and safe alternative to fluoroscopy and CT for numerous procedures, including biopsies, aspirations, injections, and percutaneous releases. Recent technological advances in ultrasound, including high-frequency probes, microvascular imaging, needle-tracking systems, and robotic probe steering, have improved precision and expanded its application to complex regions such as the spine and peripheral nerves. Minimally invasive ultrasound-guided techniques now play an important role in treating conditions such as De Quervain's disease, trigger finger, Dupuytren's contracture, carpal tunnel syndrome, and epicondylitis, offering outcomes comparable to surgery with reduced morbidity. Novel biological treatments, including platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cell therapies, show regenerative potential but require further validation. Despite ongoing debate about the long-term safety of corticosteroids and local anesthetics, ultrasound guidance continues to expand its role in interventional and regenerative medicine. The integration of advanced imaging technologies with standardized protocols and specialized training is expected to further consolidate ultrasound-guided interventions as a cornerstone of modern musculoskeletal care, improving both procedural safety and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.